My wife Mary Jane and I enjoy listening to Rachel Maddow’s daily evening program on the MSNBC channel. To us, she sounds so convincing in all her opinions on the latest controversies that it is hard for us to imagine anyone thinking otherwise. "Isn’t she just laying out the obvious facts?" we think. However, we have friends, including extended family members, who think otherwise because they listen to nothing but commentators on FOX News.  For them, those commentators sound so convincing on all the latest controversies that it is hard for them to imagine anyone thinking otherwise.  “Aren’t they simply laying out the obvious facts?” our friends ask.  Uh, ohh!  How can this be?  Competing obvious facts!  How can we be sure that we are the ones who know the real obvious facts?!  How can an earnest seeker of the truth sort things out when there is no universally agreed upon and trustworthy source of facts or wise interpreters of them?  

​Although the words “fake news” and “fake media” are new to us, cynicism about statements claiming to be true is not new.  When Jesus told Pontius Pilate that he, Jesus, is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, Pilate responded by sneering, “What is truth?”  He was standing in a long skeptical and cynical tradition that believed that all truth claims are simply power moves.  The tradition is still around and is warning us to beware of anyone claiming to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth!  But, then, how then can we Christians, who believe that indeed Jesus is the embodiment of God’s truth, navigate competing truth claims, especially those dealing with racial injustice?  What light might today’s lessons shine on all of this?